AME 514 Applications of
Combustion - Fall 2008 – Homework #3
Due
Wednesday 11/5/08, 4:30 pm, at my office (OHE 430J). If youÕre off campus, you can fax it to 213-740-8071. DEN students should submit through the
usual channels. Late homework
marked down 10% per day.
Read any of the research papers listed below. For your convenience, most of the papers are available on
the class website in the /Lecture7/ folder (youÕre welcomeÉ)
á
Joulin, G.,
Sivashinsky, G. I. (1994). Combust.
Sci. Technol. 98, 11-23. Theoretical description of flames in
Hele-Shaw cells. (If you want to
review this one, I have a paper copy).
á
Yoshida, A.
(1988). Proc. Combust. Inst. 22, 1471-1478. Very good experimental characterization of distributed
combustion. (If you want to review this one, I have a paper copy).
á
Abdel-Gayed, R. G.,
Bradley, D. and Lung, F. K.-K. (1989) Combust. Flame 76, 213. Good experimental study and critical
review of flame fragmentation quenching by turbulence.
á
Cambray, P. and
Joulin, G. (1992). Twenty-Fourth
Symposium (International) on Combustion, Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, p. 61. Very interesting theoretical/computational study of the
effects of thermal expansion on premixed turbulent flame propagation. (If you want to review this one, I have
a paper copy).
á
Gouldin, F. C.
(1987). Combust. Flame 68, 249.
First paper on the fractal model of turbulent premixed flames.
á
Poinsot, T.,
Veyante, D. and Candel, S. (1990). Twenty-Third Symposium (International) on
Combustion, Combustion Institute,
Pittsburgh, p. 613. Interesting
computational study of the role of heat loss on flame/vortex interactions and
flame extinction. (If you want to
review this one, I have a paper copy).
á
H. Boughanem and A.
Trouve (1998). Proc. Combust.
Inst. 27, 971. Excellent computational study of the
effects of thermal expansion and buoyancy on premixed turbulent flames.
á
Buckmaster, J. D., Combust.
Sci. Tech. 115, 41 (1996). First theoretical description of edge
flames. (If you want to review
this one, I have a paper copy).
á Buckmaster, J. D. and Short, M. (1999). Cellular instabilities, sub-limit
structures and edge-flames in premixed counterflows. Combust. Theory Modelling 3, 199-214.
First paper describing in detail the flame tube phenomenon.
á M. S. Cha and S. H. Chung (1996). Characteristics of lifted flames in
nonpremixed turbulent confined jets.
Proc. Combust. Inst.
26, 121–128. Very good
experimental paper on lifted nonpremixed flames.
á J. Daou, A Li–‡n (1998). ÒThe role of unequal diffusivities in ignition and
extinction fronts in strained mixing layers,Ó Combust. Theory Modelling 2, 449–477. Very good theoretical/computational paper on the propagation
rates of nonpremixed edge flames including Lewis number effects.
á J. Daou and A. Li–‡n (1999). ÒIgnition and extinction fronts in
counterflowing premixed reactive gases,Ó Combust. Flame. 118, 479-488. Very good
theoretical/computational paper on the propagation rates of premixed edge
flames including Lewis number effects.
á
R. W. Thatcher and
J. W. Dold (2000). ÒEdges of
flames that do not exist: flame-edge dynamics in a non-premixed
counterflow.Ó Combust. Theory
Modelling 4, 435-457. Good theoretical/computational paper on
Òflame tubeÓ formation in nonpremixed flames.
á
R. Daou, J. Daou, J.
Dold (2002). ÒEffect of volumetric
heat-loss on triple flame propagationÓ Proc. Combust. Inst., Vol. 29, pp. 1559 - 1564. Definitive theoretical paper on the
effect of heat loss on nonpremixed edge flames.
á
Ruetsch, G. R.,
Vervisch, L. and Linan, A. (1995). Effects of heat release on triple flames. Physics
of Fluids 7, 1447. First study of the effects of thermal
expansion on edge-flame speeds.
Prepare a critical review of the article, not to
exceed 2 pages, structured as follows:
¥ Why
the author(s) conducted the work
¥
Summary of the results
¥
Summary of the conclusions
¥
Your opinion of the merits of the work
¥
Your opinion of the shortcomings of the work
1.
By analogy with the
analysis for laminar flames in tubes, develop a criterion for the
extinguishment, via heat losses to tube walls, of turbulent flames in the
distributed reaction zone regime.
Assume the integral scale is equal to the tube diameter (not a bad
assumption!) Compare with
Bradley's (older) quenching criteria Ka Å 0.08 ReL1/2 for ReL < 300,
and Ka Å 1.6 = constant for ReL > 300.
2.
Redo the analysis of lifted flames for a
very long slot jet instead of
a round jet. The only difference
in the analysis is that the area is proportional to rjetL, where L
is the (constant) length of the slot in the long dimension, rather than rjet2. In particular
a)
compute the scaling
of mean velocity, jet width and mass flux as a function of the axial distance
x.
b)
compute the scaling
of mean strain rate as a function of jet Reynolds number
c)
compute the expected
scaling of liftoff height as a function of jet Reynolds number
3.
In class it was
suggested that the liftoff height (xLO) of a nonpremixed round jet
flame is at the location where the mean turbulent strain rate is equal to the
extinction stretch rate of a laminar flame (Sext). Several other mechanisms of stabilization of turbulent
lifted jet flames have been proposed.
Determine the scaling relationship between liftoff height (xLO)
and the jet parameters exit velocity (Uo), jet exit diameter (do),
gas viscosity (n) and flame
parameters SL and/or Sext assuming the lifted flame is located at the position
where
a)
the transition from
flamelet to distributed combustion occurs, i.e., Ka = 1
b) the mean velocity (
) is equal to the turbulent burning velocity (ST)
of a distributed flame with burning velocity given by DamkšhlerÕs model
c)
the mean velocity (
) is equal to
propagation speed of a non-premixed edge flame (actually, a bunch of edge
flames) propagating with an edge speed given by Daou and Li–anÕs model
d)
the mean velocity (
) is equal to the
turbulent burning velocity (ST) of a wrinkled laminar flame with
burning velocity given by GouldinÕs fractal model assuming the Kolmogorov scale,
LK, is the inner cutoff scale.
e)
the mean velocity (
) is equal to the
turbulent burning velocity (ST) of a wrinkled laminar flame with
burning velocity given by the ÒstandardÓ flamelet relation ST ~ uÕ
(why doesnÕt this one work???)
For
your convenience, here are the turbulent round-jet scaling relations:
![]()
![]()
4.
Edge flames
a)
For a nonpremixed
methane-air edge flame with b
Å 15, Le Å 0.8, approximately what strain rate (S) would correspond to zero edge speed? Use Daou and Li–‡nÕs model and estimate
all necessary parameters needed to obtain a dimensional value of S (in 1/sec) from their dimensionless parameters.
b)
For this same case,
approximately what strain rate (S) would correspond to the maximum edge speed? What would this maximum speed be (in
cm/sec)?
c)
For this same case,
how much higher would this maximum speed be if thermal expansion effects were
included?
5.
Consider a turbulent
premixed flame in a lean methane-air mixture whose laminar burning velocity (SL)
is 10 cm/s = 0.10 m/s. The
integral length scale of turbulence is 5 cm. Use the following mixture properties if needed: air density (r) = 1.18 kg/m3, viscosity (n) = 1.5 x 10-5 m2/s, thermal
diffusivity (a) = 2.2 x 10-5
m2/s.
a)
What turbulence
intensity (uÕ) would be required to extinguish this flame if extinction
occurred according to BradleyÕs criterion, namely Ka = 0.37 ReL1/2?
b)
What would the
Kolmogorov length scale be at this condition?
d)
For this
stoichiometric mixture, what would the turbulent burning velocity be? (Use any model you want that is
appropriate for the combustion regime you decided on in part c).
e)
If you used a
turbulent jet flow (like that analyzed in the context of nonpremixed turbulent
flames in Lecture 10), what jet exit diameter (do), exit velocity (Uo)
and downstream distance (x) would provide the required uÕ and LI? (Note that there may be more than one
suitable combination of do, Uo, and x.)